Apple Touch Icon

Customer Login | Wholesale Login | Dealer Login | Residential Services | Wholesale

Skype, Google and Facebook all battle for VoIP....and why you shouldn't care

Posted on February 3, 2011

The big buzz recently centered around Facebook and whether or not (or when) the company will introduce VoIP-based calling capabilities between its members.  And this article again raises the vision of Facebook as an “e-mail killer,” as it evolves its capabilities to go head-to-head against the likes of Google Voice and Skype.

From a consumer point of view, that’s all well and good.  But from a business perspective, you may want to read and act on this with a grain (if not a block) of salt. 

Here’s why: consumer-based VoIP is still gaining traction.  And when offered through services such as Skype and Google, largely for free or next-to-nothing pricing, it’s clear that they’re aiming for mass adoption as a way of attracting the audiences they want and need to bring in advertisers.

By contrast, business-based VoIP has been fully operational for more than a decade, back to when the bandwidth needed to make it practical was still prohibitively expensive for all but larger businesses.  While the price of that bandwidth has fallen through the floor, the operational and business requirements needed to make it work have not:  reliable performance was, and remains, the pre-eminent thing businesses need in order to replace their traditional landlines with VoIP.

That means they can’t and won’t tolerate packet garble…they won’t accept an infrastructure that doesn’t scale to multiple concurrent users…and above all else, they refuse to live with the uncertainty of whether a network will be operational at any given point.  Take the recent frustration level of consumers when the Skype network went down for more than 24 hours right before Christmas.   The Twitterverse was agog with people bitterly complaining.  Most of them, however, were end-user consumers.  Business users have far greater reliability requirements;  most consumers have never even heard of an SLA.  And Skype’s lack of immediate customer support, except through e-mail, might leave business users wanting far more.

So, business customers must rely on providers who deliver not only the bandwidth, but also the reliability and the technical support needed to ensure that the service is up and running as close to the “five nines” as possible.  And they need the immediate technical support when things aren’t running seamlessly. 

At Windstream, we offer bundled VoIP and data services as well as a hosted VoIP solution, that deliver a solid, consistent level of combined performance and reliability.  Most consumers don’t need that level…Twitter posts notwithstanding.  But businesses do.  And services from the Skypes, Facebooks and Googles of the world aren’t designed to deliver that kind of support that Windstream’s solutions can.

So, read the articles, follow the updates, but understand that as a business person, the buzz has little to do with what you need to do business.

Category:

4 Comments:

Anonymous said...
i think any buisness owner with a mediocum of tech savy-ness would know this....however i wonder if windstream is concerned that many folks will be jumping on the skype/facebook/google voip bandwagon, given the tone of this article.
July 7, 2011 11:07
Anonymous said...
I agree, and find it necessary to educate many small customers on the differences...most get it, the cheap ones never will...
July 7, 2011 12:07
Anonymous said...
I know by the masses that Skype,Google voice focus on free services and non-business based demographics. This will change... This will change, Cloud based application hosting is growing on places like Amazon and Google is dabbling with this. You will see things drastic shift for big companies to grab businesses and charge them on a per data usage type of rate. Look at the placement of huge Data Storage Warehouses in North Carolina recently by Facebook. They are putting this all in place for growth and more opportunity. They use these free services as test platforms. They are looking towards grabbing these businesses. RingCentral is now moving to PBX Voip Asterick platforms. Next, Google just made it available to use Local Number Portability to port your own number to Google voice. I see Google with a softphone and a Vonage type platform coming that can be scaled up for big business (IE:RingCentral). If you think they won't tap in this market or not planning to would be a blind assumption. SLA soon will be on a payment per scale basis.
July 7, 2011 12:07
Anonymous said...
I think we underestimate the ability of our customers to assimilate info, adapt in a changing market, and evolve into a market that is converging in terms of euipment & costs. It is not about SLA rather SERVICE and costs. If the customer thinks they can live without service, which noone gives in a corporate climate anyway, they will inevitably gravitate towards the cheapest solution. Many IT staff are savy enough to point their customers toward a cheaper evolving technology and manage for them-JOB security! EVERY segment of my market both small, medium, & large enterprise has a current or future VoIP/telepresence strategy. Are we naive? FaceBook, Google, etc has & will change the way we do business!
July 7, 2011 12:07

Post a comment

Recent Tweets

Windstream - May 14 @ 17:09
The outage in Florida has been resolved. Sorry for the trouble. If you are still experiencing problems, please contact support.

Windstream - May 14 @ 15:49
RT @windstream: Progress is being made on the outage in Florida. No ETA at this time. We apologize for the trouble.

Windstream - May 14 @ 14:32
Progress is being made on the outage in Florida. No ETA at this time. We apologize for the trouble.

Archive